On Jan 14, 2008 12:38 PM, Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Was there a programming perl book for Perl 1? Or any other books?
For now I'm kinda stuck, because I don't know the exact semantics of
each
construct of Perl 1.
I ran into the same thing. The first
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Was there a programming perl book for Perl 1? Or any other books?
For now I'm kinda stuck, because I don't know the exact semantics of each
construct of Perl 1.
I ran into the same thing. The first edition of Programming perl
wasn't until Perl 4. The best you're going
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Unless I misunderstood the Yacc/bison manual, the /order/ in which the
operator associativity is declared, defines the precedence, from top to
bottom in increasing order. So:
%left '+' '-'
%left '*' '/' '%'
means that *, / and % take precedence over + and -.
Aye, but
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:35:57PM -0500, jesse wrote:
If only Perl1 source would compile, then it'd be
easier, but it doesn't compile on windows (xp) and can't get it working on
cygwin either.
That sounds like the sort of situation where VMWare Player and, say, an
ubuntu or redhat
jesse wrote:
If only Perl1 source would compile, then it'd be
easier, but it doesn't compile on windows (xp) and can't get it working on
cygwin either.
That sounds like the sort of situation where VMWare Player and, say, an
ubuntu or redhat virtual machine might come in really handy. I don't
On Jan 14, 2008 11:29 AM, Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jesse wrote:
I don't believe Perl 1 was ever ported to Windows.
Well, actually it kinda was. ;-)
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl1.porters/2005/11/msg46.html
Cool! So where's that patch you mentioned? The
On Jan 14, 2008 5:57 PM, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:29 AM, Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jesse wrote:
I don't believe Perl 1 was ever ported to Windows.
Well, actually it kinda was. ;-)
For a fun bit of trivia, spend some time comparing Perl 1's perl.y and
Perl 5's perly.y. Amazing how much still persists after 20 years.
Technological Cheshire cats; the grin lingers long after the cat has
disappeared. Computing has them by the clowder.
--
Email and shopping with the
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 5:57 PM, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:29 AM, Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jesse wrote:
I don't believe Perl 1 was ever ported to Windows.
Well, actually it kinda was. ;-)
hi,
I've been working a bit on Perl 1 (Punie), but writing a compiler for a
language that I never used is kinda tricky :-P
It's really nice to look at Perl 1 and see how it has evolved over time. Of
course, it'd be quite interesting to compare speed of Perl 1 and Punie (perl
1 on parrot).
Does
If only Perl1 source would compile, then it'd be
easier, but it doesn't compile on windows (xp) and can't get it working on
cygwin either.
That sounds like the sort of situation where VMWare Player and, say, an
ubuntu or redhat virtual machine might come in really handy. I don't
believe Perl
11 matches
Mail list logo
