Re: Bugfix release?

2002-04-02 Thread Steve Fink
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? > If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. > -- Everything I wanted to get in to a 0.0.5 release is there now.

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Melvin Smith
At 06:45 PM 3/30/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > > At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > >With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If > so, > > >a 0.0.5

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Melvin Smith
At 04:59 PM 3/30/2002 +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote: >"Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? > > If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. > >The one outstanding issue that

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Michel J Lambert
> "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? > > If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. > > The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in > ad

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:45 PM + 3/30/02, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: >> At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: >> >With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, >> >a 0.0.5 bugfix r

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:52:35AM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, > >a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. > > My crashme program crashes no

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Steve Fink
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:47:11AM -0800, Steve Fink wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? > > If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. > > -- > &g

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Steve Fink
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 09:38:31AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? > If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. > -- I'm still getting a test failure on stacks.t, in test #7. Until that's fix

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Melvin Smith
At 09:38 AM 3/30/2002 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: >With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, >a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. My crashme program crashes no more, we are 10x more stable than a week ago. I think Peter's patch or a variation

Re: Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Peter Gibbs
"Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? > If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. The one outstanding issue that I know of is the mem_realloc problem in add_pmc_to_free and add_header_to_f

Bugfix release?

2002-03-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
With the recent stack and GC patches, are we pretty much solid now? If so, a 0.0.5 bugfix release may well be in order. -- Dan --"it's like this"--- Dan Sugalski