Re: CALL__BUILD

2004-05-17 Thread Jens Rieks
On Monday 17 May 2004 23:14, you wrote: > Should I stick with library/ or runtime/include/? I vote for runtime/parrot/library/SDL The paths currently in use are going to stay valid this way. FWI, runtime/parrot/perl6 et al can hold language specific libraries (if a language does not use its own d

Re: CALL__BUILD

2004-05-17 Thread chromatic
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 14:12, Jens Rieks wrote: > > It's ok for me. > The patch is in. > > The SDL stuff now works without any special environment variables. Unless someone hollers in the next day or two, I'll check in the new libraries and examples. Should I stick with library/ or runtime/inclu

Re: CALL__BUILD

2004-05-17 Thread Jens Rieks
Hi, On Monday 17 May 2004 15:07, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > Should I apply it? > > It's ok for me. The patch is in. The SDL stuff now works without any special environment variables. jens

Re: CALL__BUILD

2004-05-17 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > whats the plan WRT to CALL__BUILD? > I've written a patch that makes it the default, but does a fallback to > "__init" if no BUILD property is set. [ ... ] > Should I apply it? It's ok for me. > jens leo

CALL__BUILD

2004-05-14 Thread Jens Rieks
Hi, whats the plan WRT to CALL__BUILD? I've written a patch that makes it the default, but does a fallback to "__init" if no BUILD property is set. If the __init method does not exists, no exception is thrown (like before), whereas now an exception is thrown if you specify a BUI