G'day all.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 09:55:46AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> It's fine for partial continuations certainly, but less fine if you
> want to implement full continations which require you to save the
> state of the entire stack. I was hoping I'd find a way to do this
> without having
Andrew J Bromage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G'day all.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:06:04AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>
>> If I'm going to be doing tail call optimization
>> (and I can't call it scheme if I don't) then my first thought was as
>> follows.
>>
>> # This is a tail call
>>
>
G'day all.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:06:04AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> If I'm going to be doing tail call optimization
> (and I can't call it scheme if I don't) then my first thought was as
> follows.
>
> # This is a tail call
>
> branch FOO_tail
> ...
>
> #
So, here I am, roughing out some ideas for how I'm going to implement
a very lovely and worthwhile scheme interpreter (or a compiler, I'm
not proud) for parrot. If I'm going to be doing tail call optimization
(and I can't call it scheme if I don't) then my first thought was as
follows.
# This i
