In message
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you taken a look at the proposed ops in PDD6? They may not be
> what we ultimately want to use, but it might be a place to start.
> (And I'd rather avoid generic vtable access to keys if at
At 10:56 AM +0100 8/26/02, Tom Hughes wrote:
>The one part of the keyed access puzzle that my last patch did not
>attempt to address is that of constructing keys dynamically.
>
>As things stand you can create a key PMC and you can set the value
>of that PMC to a given integer, number, string or PM
The one part of the keyed access puzzle that my last patch did not
attempt to address is that of constructing keys dynamically.
As things stand you can create a key PMC and you can set the value
of that PMC to a given integer, number, string or PMC value. What you
can't do is join several key PMC