Re: FP constants

2001-12-05 Thread James Mastros
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Q: What about endianness? > A: Native endianness. Byteswapping's easy enough. Where in the packfile does it define the native endinaness of floats? (Note "native endianess" has to include wheather the sign is the MSB or the LSB, and the endianness of the e

Re: FP constants

2001-12-04 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 01:32 pm, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Okay, here's the decree. > > > > FP constants in the bytecode file constants section will be 64-bit IEEE > > floats. > > You mean something like th

Re: FP constants

2001-12-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 01:32 PM 12/4/2001 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: >On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > Okay, here's the decree. > > > > FP constants in the bytecode file constants section will be 64-bit IEEE > floats. > >You mean something like this? Nope. :)

Re: FP constants

2001-12-04 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Okay, here's the decree. > > FP constants in the bytecode file constants section will be 64-bit IEEE floats. You mean something like this? --- parrot/Configure.pl Sun Dec 2 00:06:30 2001 +++ parrot-andy/Configure.plTue Dec 4

FP constants

2001-12-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
Okay, here's the decree. FP constants in the bytecode file constants section will be 64-bit IEEE floats. The Q&A as to why. (This'll be a new feature for all the declarations of arbitrary decisions) - Q: Why?