On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:34:27PM -0400, Mike Lambert wrote:
> > Collect's dead, I think. I'm not seeing the point anymore, and since
> > we do collect runs through the buffers and not the PMCs, there's no
> > place to find what needs calling.
>
> Well, the hashtable could certainly use it. :) T
At 3:34 PM -0400 5/20/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
> > At 12:06 AM -0400 5/19/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
>> >Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put
>back
>> >onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all
>pmc's
>> >before moving anything to the freelis
> At 12:06 AM -0400 5/19/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
> >Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put
back
> >onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all
pmc's
> >before moving anything to the freelist, in case of dependancies between
> >pmcs and buffers)
>
At 12:06 AM -0400 5/19/02, Mike Lambert wrote:
>Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put back
>onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all pmc's
>before moving anything to the freelist, in case of dependancies between
>pmcs and buffers)
Nope. I do
So we're going to support some vtable operations for GC support.
We currently have mark, and we're going to have collect.
Is there a plan to make a freed method for when pmc header gets put back
onto the free list? (This would require we call this method on all pmc's
before moving anything to the
