# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #17533]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17533 >
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > > > cd languages/perl6
> > >
On Mon 09 Sep 2002 22:22, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>
> [HP-UX 11.00, GNU gcc-3.2]
>
> > > cd languages/perl6
> > > make
> >
> > For gcc (which was the last I used) I got :(
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld -o imcc imcparser.o imclexer.o imc.
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Will Coleda wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:02:55PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > For development and testing, I believe that we should exercise (and then
> > exorcise) all the bugs in all the languages we can find.
> Any particular reason no
Any particular reason not to have a specific make target for the
tinderboxen?
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:02:55PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>>
Now why that [languages] i
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
[HP-UX 11.00, GNU gcc-3.2]
> > cd languages/perl6
> > make
>
> For gcc (which was the last I used) I got :(
>
> /usr/bin/ld -o imcc imcparser.o imclexer.o imc.o stacks.o symreg.o instructions.o
>cfg.o sets.o debug.o anyop.o ../../platform.o
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:02:55PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > > Now why that [languages] isn't part of the default build, I don't
> > > know.
>
> > None of the stuff in languages/ is part of the
On 9 Sep 2002 at 15:02, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>
> > None of the stuff in languages/ is part of the default build, and I think
> > it should stay that way. It seems like bad form to, by default, build
> > parts of a package that the user may not want t
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > Now why that [languages] isn't part of the default build, I don't
> > know.
> None of the stuff in languages/ is part of the default build, and I think
> it should stay that way. It seems like bad form to
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Thanks for running the tests. If you're really ambitious, you could
>
> cd languages/perl6
> make
>
> and see what happens, but unless you've got bison and flex installed,
> don't bother (I submitted a patch to pregenerate the files, but it'
On Mon 09 Sep 2002 17:39, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>
> > On Mon 02 Sep 2002 22:25, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Similarly, it may be a good time to revisit our "core" platforms and see
> > > if they all work.
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> On Mon 02 Sep 2002 22:25, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Similarly, it may be a good time to revisit our "core" platforms and see
> > if they all work. A lot of the library stuff, especially the shared
> > library stuff, is rather d
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> *) Careful elimination of all compiler warnings, particularly on non x86
>platforms, and for builds with non-default INTVAL size
I agree here. There are still *lots* of warnings. I've slowly whittled
away at them, but there are lots to go. Fixin
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 11:15:17AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:25:30AM -0700, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a call for potential goals for the 0.0.9 release of parrot. My list:
> > >
> > > *) Exceptions
> > > *) initial
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:25:30AM -0700, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > Here's a call for potential goals for the 0.0.9 release of parrot. My list:
> >
> > *) Exceptions
> > *) initial PMC freeze/thaw API
> > *) Sub indicators in bytecode
> > *) On-the-fly b
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Here's a call for potential goals for the 0.0.9 release of parrot. My list:
>
> *) Exceptions
> *) initial PMC freeze/thaw API
> *) Sub indicators in bytecode
> *) On-the-fly bytecode section generation
*) methods (in PASM and C)
*) implementation of som
Here's a call for potential goals for the 0.0.9 release of parrot. My list:
*) Exceptions
*) initial PMC freeze/thaw API
*) Sub indicators in bytecode
*) On-the-fly bytecode section generation
Anyone got any others? We can get the list together and then
prioritize from there.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo