At 13:16 on 09/21/2001 EDT, Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> At 09:37 AM 9/21/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> >> The names are unique in the first 31 chars. Are we OK, or do I need
> >> to mangle the names? I could
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> At 09:37 AM 9/21/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>> The names are unique in the first 31 chars. Are we OK, or do I need
>> to mangle the names? I could mangle them by doing one of the following:
DS> Try choosing something smal
At 09:37 AM 9/21/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>The names are unique in the first 31 chars. Are we OK, or do I need
>to mangle the names? I could mangle them by doing one of the following:
Try choosing something smaller. (If for no other reason than I don't want
to have to type that long a
Dan --
> Just a reminder--function names shouldn't exceed 31 characters. The C
> standard doesn't guarantee anything past that...
Using this simplistic program I found two names greater than 31 chars.
I don't know if there are names not fitting the little regexp used here,
but of those that do,
At 02:17 PM 9/20/2001 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:09:52PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Just a reminder--function names shouldn't exceed 31 characters. The C
> > standard doesn't guarantee anything past that...
>
>You think that's bad? You aren't guaranteed more than si
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:09:52PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Just a reminder--function names shouldn't exceed 31 characters. The C
> standard doesn't guarantee anything past that...
You think that's bad? You aren't guaranteed more than six characters,
case-insensitive for external identifier
Just a reminder--function names shouldn't exceed 31 characters. The C
standard doesn't guarantee anything past that...
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL
