On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
> Dan Sugalski:
> # > (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)
> #
> # Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?
>
> Presumably, "Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if
> need be, but that requires using a full cont
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
> Dan Sugalski:
> # Ah. That one's the collective fault of the denizens of the Little
> # Languages mailing list and the MIT Lisp and/or Scheme folks.
>
> Oh, and in case it wasn't abundantly clear before, I already picked up a
> copy--a month or so ago, whil
Dan Sugalski:
# Ah. That one's the collective fault of the denizens of the Little
# Languages mailing list and the MIT Lisp and/or Scheme folks.
Oh, and in case it wasn't abundantly clear before, I already picked up a
copy--a month or so ago, while I was on vacation and needed something to
read du
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
> Dan Sugalski:
> # > (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)
> #
> # Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?
>
> Presumably, "Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if
> need be, but that requires using a full continuation-passing fun
Dan Sugalski:
# > (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)
#
# Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?
Presumably, "Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if
need be, but that requires using a full continuation-passing function
call system, something we chose not to do."
--
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:16:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > And it's your job, if you choose to accept it, to help make it horribly
> > out-of-date. :)
>
> Are there going to be (booby) prizes for the people who make the most
> paragraphs obsole
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> I do have an older version of Borland that I can mail you, but I think it
> is at least 2 releases old
> As for Microsoft I can't help with a license, but I can probably get us
> one for IBM Visual Age.
I may be able to scare up media and license fro
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:16:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> And it's your job, if you choose to accept it, to help make it horribly
> out-of-date. :)
Are there going to be (booby) prizes for the people who make the most
paragraphs obsolete? Is anyone counting?
(Who do I score the U-turn on pa
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> Eep, I was too busy poking fun at Dan about the book I forgot to say:
>
> 1) I do not represent IBM nor IBM's preferences for development
> environment, I was just guessing.
> You are welcome to add IBM Visual Age stuff in there, let me know if
>
ad version that is
non-commercial usable? I'll check.
-Melvin
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2003 03:08 PM
To: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions
On Thu
done, I did finally get a look at it at Barnes
and Noble. Good job Dan/Leo.
Cheers,
-Melvin
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2003 02:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions
I'm about done setting
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> Based on current customers I would guess the following in priority:
>
> VC/C++ (latest non-.NET version, most people I know are still building
> their stuff with Pre-.NET versions)
> Visual Studio .NET
> Cygwin
> Borland C++ Builder
I don't have VC/C++
AIL PROTECTED]>
09/11/2003 02:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions
I'm about done setting up the TPF Win32 tinderbox machine. It's a WinXP
Pro gadget with Visual Studio .NET. I'm going to install cygw
I'm about done setting up the TPF Win32 tinderbox machine. It's a WinXP
Pro gadget with Visual Studio .NET. I'm going to install cygwin as well.
I'll be setting up tinderboxes for it but, honestly, I don't do windows
programming, so I'm not particularly sure what'd be useful. I'm going to
try a
14 matches
Mail list logo
