Re: Object initialization protocol breakage?

2006-01-26 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:45:11 +0100 Bob Rogers wrote: > I notice that using an :opt_flag here also works now; it didn't seem to > before. Of course ;-) What is it they say about weapons pacts? "Trust but verify"? ;-} > You ma

Re: Object initialization protocol breakage?

2006-01-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bob Rogers wrote: I notice that using an :opt_flag here also works now; it didn't seem to before. Of course ;-) You may or may not want to include the extra test (attached). You have still troubles with svn ci? leo

Re: Object initialization protocol breakage?

2006-01-25 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:54:59 +0100 Bob Rogers wrote: >Sometime between r11268 (probably) and 11276, there was a change to > the way that initialization methods get called, regardless of whether > "__init" or a 'BUILD' property is u

Re: Object initialization protocol breakage?

2006-01-25 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bob Rogers wrote: Sometime between r11268 (probably) and 11276, there was a change to the way that initialization methods get called, regardless of whether "__init" or a 'BUILD' property is used. If I do .local pmc foo, hash .local int foo_class foo_class = find_type

Object initialization protocol breakage?

2006-01-21 Thread Bob Rogers
Sometime between r11268 (probably) and 11276, there was a change to the way that initialization methods get called, regardless of whether "__init" or a 'BUILD' property is used. If I do .local pmc foo, hash .local int foo_class foo_class = find_type "User::Foo"