On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:00:57AM -0800, Charles Bunders wrote:
> Checking some things by compiling and running another small C program (this
> could take a while):
>
> Building ./testparrotsizes.cfrom testparrotsizes_c.in...
>
> #include "parrot/parrot.h"
> ..^
> %CC-F-NOINCLFILE
Configure.pl had a few problems. Thought I would send it to the list. Below
this is a 'perl -"V"' if you want to know that info.
Thanks...
Parrot Version 0.0.4 Configure
Copyright (C) 2001-2002 Yet Another Society
Since you're running this script, you obviously have
Perl 5--I'll be pulling s
At 10:08 PM -0500 3/17/02, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>Poking around in the DECC manual, there's two problems.
>http://www.openvms.compaq.com/commercial/c/5492p004.htm#index_x_113
>
>First, its INCLUDE_DIRECTORY, not INCLUDE (although INCLUDE works).
VMS applies the shortest unique prefix rule with
_113
First, its INCLUDE_DIRECTORY, not INCLUDE (although INCLUDE works).
Second, there seems to be some confusing rules about mixing VMS and
Unix style paths. It seems that the style used in INCLUDE_DIRECTORY
has to match the style used in the #include.
Search the places specified in
Michael G Schwern:
# On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:13:58AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
# > Lines in question:
# >
# >
# > foreach(grep {/^i_/} keys %Config) {
# > $c{$_}=$Config{$_};
# > $c{headers}.=defineifdef((/^i_(.*)$/));
# > }
# >
# > I think VMS is too lame to handle the grep line. Honest
>personal dislike for VMS. I don't know enough about VMS to form an
>opinion on it--its popular days were before my time. ;^)
I never cared for the VMS command shell (I think it was DCL, been a few
years since I worked on it), but there is a lot to be learned
from the VMS architecture itself.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 10:13:58AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
> Lines in question:
>
>
> foreach(grep {/^i_/} keys %Config) {
> $c{$_}=$Config{$_};
> $c{headers}.=defineifdef((/^i_(.*)$/));
> }
>
> I think VMS is too lame to handle the grep line. Honestly, I'd rather
> not change it to bo
At 11:52 AM -0800 3/17/02, Brent Dax wrote:
>Dan Sugalski:
># At 10:13 AM -0800 3/17/02, Brent Dax wrote:
># ># Probing Perl 5's configuration to determine which headers you
># ># have (this could
># ># take a while on slow machines)...
># ># Out of memory!
># ># %SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
># >
># >Li
I suspect that it's not that VMS can't handle it- it's more likely that
VMS does a better job of placing quotas on memory usage than other OSes.
There's probably something analogous to "ulimit" which would fix the
issue, but requiring that in order to build parrot isn't really reasonable.
If w
Dan Sugalski:
# At 10:13 AM -0800 3/17/02, Brent Dax wrote:
# ># Probing Perl 5's configuration to determine which headers you
# ># have (this could
# ># take a while on slow machines)...
# ># Out of memory!
# ># %SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
# >
# >Lines in question:
# >
# >
# >foreach(grep {/^i_/} keys
At 10:13 AM -0800 3/17/02, Brent Dax wrote:
># Probing Perl 5's configuration to determine which headers you
># have (this could
># take a while on slow machines)...
># Out of memory!
># %SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
>
>Lines in question:
>
>
>foreach(grep {/^i_/} keys %Config) {
> $c{$_}=$Config{$_}
Michael G Schwern:
# Using 5.005_03 on OpenVMS 7.3...
#
#
# Determining if your C compiler is actually gcc (this could
# take a while):
#
#
# Your C compiler is not gcc.
#
#
# Probing Perl 5's configuration to determine which headers you
# have (this could
# take a while on slow mac
Using 5.005_03 on OpenVMS 7.3...
Determining if your C compiler is actually gcc (this could take a while):
Your C compiler is not gcc.
Probing Perl 5's configuration to determine which headers you have (this could
take a while on slow machines)...
Out of memory!
%SYSTEM-F-ABORT,
Dan Sugalski:
# At 02:56 PM 10/4/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
# >Can't we just use a hints file? :(
#
# Give me a day or so and I'll get it fixed properly. I'm used
# to that by
If you're hacking in that area, can you package the test.c stuff in a
subroutine for ease of hints overloading?
# n
At 02:45 PM 10/4/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:18:04PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
> > foreach(grep {/pattern/} keys %Config) {
> > blah blah blah
> >
> > with:
> >
> > while($_=each %Config) {
> > next unless /pattern/;
> >
At 02:56 PM 10/4/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>Can't we just use a hints file? :(
Give me a day or so and I'll get it fixed properly. I'm used to that by
now... :) (There's a reason we just chucked it all and do our own thing to
configure stuff in perl 5 on VMS)
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 02:45:31PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> Oh dear.
Even if I hack it wildly:
Alright, now I'm gonna check some stuff by compiling and running
a small C program. This could take a bit...
Use of uninitialized value at configure.pl line 140.
CC/DECC /float=ieee/Include=[]/Sta
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:18:04PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
> foreach(grep {/pattern/} keys %Config) {
> blah blah blah
>
> with:
>
> while($_=each %Config) {
> next unless /pattern/;
> blah blah blah
Better, but it doesn't appear to ever *en
though.
# >
# > Waiting might also help to shake out whatever's wrong with
# Win2K. Maybe
# > it's just Brent's system being funny. (And I'd try playing
# with Compaq
# > Test Drive's OpenVMS system, but I can't find gzip, vmstar
# or, unfortunately,
# > per
ht also help to shake out whatever's wrong with Win2K. Maybe
> it's just Brent's system being funny. (And I'd try playing with Compaq
> Test Drive's OpenVMS system, but I can't find gzip, vmstar or, unfortunately,
> perl. And damn, it's been a long time
's system being funny. (And I'd try playing with Compaq
Test Drive's OpenVMS system, but I can't find gzip, vmstar or, unfortunately,
perl. And damn, it's been a long time since I used DCL.)
No release today, folks. False alarm.
--
With the arrest of Dimitry Sklyarov it has
At 06:49 PM 10/3/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:52:05PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > If we don't build on VMS it's not a show-stopper for 0.02.
>
>I think it is. There's not much point having a core platforms
>list if we selectively ignore it. :(
Well, like any othe
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 01:52:05PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> If we don't build on VMS it's not a show-stopper for 0.02.
I think it is. There's not much point having a core platforms
list if we selectively ignore it. :(
--
* DrForr digs around for a fresh IV drip bag and proceeds to hook up.
At 07:47 PM 10/3/2001 +0200, Henrik Tougaard wrote:
> > Fra: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > Botheration, I forgot all about this. How's it coming on?
>
>I haven't had any tuits yet.
>Has anybody involved the vms-perl list?
I have, but everyone's tied up. As am I, unfortunately.
> Fra: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Botheration, I forgot all about this. How's it coming on?
I haven't had any tuits yet.
Has anybody involved the vms-perl list?
I forgot to include them in the original mail,
but someone migth have tuits enough to start it.
Does VMS have to be
Botheration, I forgot all about this. How's it coming on?
--
IBM:
It may be slow, but it's hard to use.
26 matches
Mail list logo
