On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:22:27 -0700, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Diephouse wrote:
>
> > Again, sorry: I should have mentioned that you'll probably need to
> > grab a new copy of Parrot from CVS (the fix depends on recent
> > changes).
>
> So a 'cvs up -PAd' should do it in my t
Matt Diephouse wrote:
> Again, sorry: I should have mentioned that you'll probably need to
> grab a new copy of Parrot from CVS (the fix depends on recent
> changes).
So a 'cvs up -PAd' should do it in my tree?
--
Jack J. Woehr # Ordinator consistetvr,
PO Box 51, Golden, CO 80402
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:16:33 -0700, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, maybe it's my Parrot build then that is defective:
Again, sorry: I should have mentioned that you'll probably need to
grab a new copy of Parrot from CVS (the fix depends on recent
changes).
I'll find my brain soon
Matt Diephouse wrote:
> I've updated my Forth implementation to work again. There's not much
> new besides that, unfortunately. But if you're interested, you can
> download it here:
>
> http://matt.diephouse.com/software/parrot-forth-0.1.1.tar.gz
Hmm, maybe it&
I've updated my Forth implementation to work again. There's not much
new besides that, unfortunately. But if you're interested, you can
download it here:
http://matt.diephouse.com/software/parrot-forth-0.1.1.tar.gz
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
