On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
>When tests fail for Really Bad reasons, they tend to do something like this:
>
>Got: '
>'
>Expected: '
>ok 1
>...
>'
>
>It'd be really nice if we could intercept that and give more detail on why
>the test failed. Did the assembler compile to a PBC ok? Did
On Tuesday 25 September 2001 00:00, Simon Cozens wrote:
> When tests fail for Really Bad reasons, they tend to do something like
> this:
>
> Got: '
> '
> Expected: '
> ok 1
> ...
> '
>
> It'd be really nice if we could intercept that and give more detail on why
> the test failed. Did the assembler
When tests fail for Really Bad reasons, they tend to do something like this:
Got: '
'
Expected: '
ok 1
...
'
It'd be really nice if we could intercept that and give more detail on why
the test failed. Did the assembler compile to a PBC ok? Did the interpreter
segfault? (This is what usually happ
