Dan Sugalski wrote:
... These are the things going in, and in
the order they're going in:
Could you comment on current unresolved issues:
- string_set, reusing string headers
- the inconsistencies in the PASM examples, especially the last one in
this thread:
"[CVS ci] string_set is back for a
At 1:19 PM +0530 11/11/02, Gopal V wrote:
If memory serves me right, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Should be reasonably straightforward. Hopefully quick, too, as I'm
pressed for time here.
--
Hmm... Object frameworks ? ... (or is that shelved for the present ?)
Not shelved, no. (And arguably the in
If memory serves me right, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> Should be reasonably straightforward. Hopefully quick, too, as I'm
> pressed for time here.
> --
Hmm... Object frameworks ? ... (or is that shelved for the present ?)
Gopal
--
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success
Okay, I survived this year's Lightweight Languages workshop, and as
part of the aftermath I have a roadmap. These are the things going
in, and in the order they're going in:
*) Exceptions. (Adding the cope and hcf instructions for them)
*) A better C function call interface. (And an incredibly h
