RE: [PATCH] Re: Question about INTVAL vs. opcode_t sizes

2002-01-06 Thread Hong Zhang
That's what I thought I remembered; in that case, here's a patch: Index: core.ops === RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/core.ops,v retrieving revision 1.68 diff -u -r1.68 core.ops --- core.ops 4 Jan 2002 02:36:25 -

RE: [PATCH] Re: Question about INTVAL vs. opcode_t sizes

2002-01-06 Thread Melvin Smith
At 06:30 PM 1/6/2002 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote: That's what I thought I remembered; in that case, here's a patch: Index: core.ops === RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/core.ops,v retrieving revision 1.68 diff -u -r1.68

Re: [PATCH] Re: Question about INTVAL vs. opcode_t sizes

2002-01-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 09:59 PM 1/4/2002 -0600, David M. Lloyd wrote: That's what I thought I remembered; in that case, here's a patch: Applied, thanks. Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even