Gibbs --
I tested the patch on CygWin, Solaris SunOS 5.8, and Tru64. It passed on
all three systems.
Thanks!
Here's the platform status of this work:
CORE PASSED:
* Linux (x86)
* CygWin
* True64
* Solaris (Sparc)
CORE NOT TESTED:
* Win32
* OpenVMS (Alpha)
* FreeBSD (x86)
This was failing here until I made the following change:
PackFile_Constant_unpack_number(struct PackFile_Constant *
self, char * packed, IV packed_size) {
char * cursor;
NV value;
NV * aligned = mem_sys_allocate(sizeof(IV));
Are you sure this is correct? Or this is
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 01:37:44PM -0700, Hong Zhang wrote:
The memcpy() can handle alignment nicely.
Not always. I tried. :(
--
How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are for. I only
coded it.
(Attributed to Linus Torvalds, somewhere in a posting)
The memcpy() can handle alignment nicely.
Not always. I tried. :(
How that could be possible? The memcpy() just does byte-by-byte
copy. It does not care anything about the alignment of source
or dest. How can it fail?
Hong
the sizeof(IV) have something to do with
it?
This code does not look right at all...can you help me understand?
-Original Message-
From: Simon Cozens
To: Gregor N. Purdy
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/30/2001 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: NV Constants
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 11:25
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:07:34PM -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote:
mem_sys_memcopy( value, cursor, sizeof(NV) )
I'm being stupid. Of course that ought to work.
(And it does, everywhere it matters.)
does the sizeof(IV) have something to do with it?
It's to do with me being confused
On Sunday 30 September 2001 08:46 pm, Simon Cozens wrote:
It's to do with me being confused between the size of the NV pointer
(which is an IV)
Not necessarily.
--
Bryan C. Warnock
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
