Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:53:36 +0200
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 03:56 schrieb Bob Rogers:
The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
code into Continuation:invoke;
From: Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:56:44 -0400
Unfortunately, this patch breaks Tcl. There seems to be some bug with
exceptions.
Here's the Tcl used for this example:
proc test {} {uplevel #0 {append}}
test
Hmm. I seem to have broken
From: Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:43:28 -0400
From: Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:56:44 -0400
Unfortunately, this patch breaks Tcl. There seems to be some bug with
exceptions.
Here's the Tcl used for
From: Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:21:32 -0400
Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try the attached patch . . .
That *does* work. I haven't applied it because it's not
necessarily urgent that Tcl work in trunk. I'm okay with
waiting a
Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matt Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:21:32 -0400
Bob Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try the attached patch . . .
That *does* work. I haven't applied it because it's not
necessarily urgent that Tcl work in
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 03:56 schrieb Bob Rogers:
The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
code into Continuation:invoke; previously, RetContinuation:invoke and
find_exception_handler also did stack-unwinding, and none of the three
did it quite the same
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:53:36 +0200
Am Montag, 18. September 2006 03:56 schrieb Bob Rogers:
The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
code into Continuation:invoke; previously, RetContinuation:invoke and
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:00:42PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
:It is probably true that Perl 6 error handling as currently defined
: could be implemented either way.
Nope, S04 specifically sez:
A CCATCH block sees the lexical scope in which it was defined, but
its caller is the dynamic
The attached patch consolidates most of the existing stack-unwinding
code into Continuation:invoke; previously, RetContinuation:invoke and
find_exception_handler also did stack-unwinding, and none of the three
did it quite the same way.
Here are the effects:
1. Improved code sharing, a
