Re: RFC 161 (v2) OO Integration/Migration Path

2000-08-28 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Dan Sugalski writes: >> If the vtable stuff goes into the core perl engine (and it probably will, >> barring performance issues), then what could happen in the > >I have a lot of questions. Please point me to the appropriate place >if they are answer

Re: RFC 161 (v2) OO Integration/Migration Path

2000-08-27 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote: > Dan Sugalski writes: > > If the vtable stuff goes into the core perl engine (and it probably will, > > barring performance issues), then what could happen in the > > I have a lot of questions. Please point me to the appropriate place > if they are

Re: RFC 161 (v2) OO Integration/Migration Path

2000-08-27 Thread Nathan Torkington
Dan Sugalski writes: > If the vtable stuff goes into the core perl engine (and it probably will, > barring performance issues), then what could happen in the I have a lot of questions. Please point me to the appropriate place if they are answered elsewhere. vtables are tables of C functions? P