Re: M2 Bytecode format

2008-04-27 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:51:43 -0700 On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:33:50 -0400 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I find pdump somewhat useful. Ok. How do you actually *build* that? There doesn't seem to be a Makefile rule for it, or ma

Re: M2 Bytecode format

2008-04-27 Thread Mark Glines
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:51:43 -0700 Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I find pdump somewhat useful. > > Ok. How do you actually *build* that? There doesn't seem to be a > Makefile rule for it, or maybe I just haven't found it yet. Oh, nevermind. It's there, I'm just braindead. Thanks!

Re: M2 Bytecode format

2008-04-27 Thread Mark Glines
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:33:50 -0400 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From: Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:59:03 -0700 > >. . . > >Should this PMC implement the "pdump" functionality > (src/packdump.c) as well as packfile.c/packout.c? > > I find p

Re: M2 Bytecode format

2008-04-17 Thread Will Coleda
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hi, Jonathan (and everyone else)! > > Wednesday on IRC, we discussed the "M2 Bytecode format" milestone. This >