On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 2:37 PM -0500 2/20/04, Simon Glover wrote:
> > I'm currently trying to put together a first draft of PDD 11 (extensions)
> > based on extend.pod plus the comments in extend.c and I've got a few
> > questions:
> >
> >[NB. I've dropped the Parrot_PMC
At 2:37 PM -0500 2/20/04, Simon Glover wrote:
I'm currently trying to put together a first draft of PDD 11 (extensions)
based on extend.pod plus the comments in extend.c and I've got a few
questions:
[NB. I've dropped the Parrot_PMC prefixes below to save typing]
i) We have _get_string, _get_p
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:04:05AM -0700, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> I'd suggest having types be integers handed out at run-time.
I thought about this before I suggested what I did, hence they TYPE
macro :) Remember, an enum is really just an integer, and your question
is about how you manage that.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Dave Goehrig wrote:
> 1.) Data creation function having both of the following properties:
> a.) Create & register new PMCs
> b.) Toggle GC on/off
>
> say with the following API for sake of arugment:
> let TYPE be either a char* or
