[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, so this is (kind of) akin to the regcomp fix - it is the "new" stuff
that is in yyl?val that should be free-d. And it is worse than that
as yyl?val is just the topmost the parser state, so if I understand correctly
it isn't only their current values, but also
Alan Burlison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If an eval{} fails because of a snytax error, yydestroy is called on
leaving the eval scope. Unfortunately it does this:
yyval = ysave-oldyyval;
yylval = ysave-oldyylval;
So anything that is in those 2 vars that hasn't made its way
