Brent, I'm not brave enough to check to see if this is applied or not. It's from 2002,
so
I'm guessing either way I can close out the ticket. Please let me know.
> [brentdax - Fri Aug 16 14:26:47 2002]:
>
> This renames Parrot_Interp &c. to be consistent with the rest of
> Parrot's structure
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go ahead. When you're done we'll get the directory move stuff done.
> This would be a good time for anyone with pending patches to check
> things in, or we'll see lots of annoying conflicts...
Nothing pneding yet ... Yep. I'm waiting for renaming and mov
At 1:20 AM -0700 9/20/03, Brent Dax wrote:
Okay, I will probably find some time to hack tomorrow, in which case
I'll start in on The Great Renaming. (It's also *right* after a feature
freeze, so hopefully there won't be too many pending patches.) Here's
my plans:
Go ahead. Wh
Brent Dax sent the following bits through the ether:
> Are there any objections to this?
Sounds good. For embedding (eg Ponie), we're going to have to make
sure that all symbols start with parrot_ / Parrot_...
Leon
--
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scribot..
Okay, I will probably find some time to hack tomorrow, in which case
I'll start in on The Great Renaming. (It's also *right* after a feature
freeze, so hopefully there won't be too many pending patches.) Here's
my plans:
* Internal struct Parrot_Interp will become st
Has happened.
IV -> INTVAL
NV -> FLOATVAL
Nobody complained when I issued a head's-up last week, so you've only got
yourself to blame if you're not OK with this. :)
--
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on
your computer." --Bruce Graham
