Re: The perl 6 parser

2003-01-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 2:31 AM -0500 1/9/03, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: Dan Sugalski wrote: Could one of the folks working on the perl 6 parser give us a status update as to where it stands? Which bits of the apocalypses don't work, and what parts of the regex definiton's not done yet? Things have stalled

Re: The perl 6 parser

2003-01-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Sean O'Rourke wrote: ... The tests should all still pass (barring inclement GC bugs), but they reflect the outdated spec. Almost: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/compiler/1.test

Re: The perl 6 parser

2003-01-08 Thread Joseph F. Ryan
Dan Sugalski wrote: Could one of the folks working on the perl 6 parser give us a status update as to where it stands? Which bits of the apocalypses don't work, and what parts of the regex definiton's not done yet? Things have stalled a bit, and I'd like to get it going again,

Re: The perl 6 parser

2003-01-08 Thread Sean O'Rourke
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Could one of the folks working on the perl 6 parser give us a status > update as to where it stands? languages/perl6/README mostly reflects the status with respect to the language definition of about 4-5 months ago. Differences include: - IIRC

The perl 6 parser

2003-01-08 Thread Dan Sugalski
Could one of the folks working on the perl 6 parser give us a status update as to where it stands? Which bits of the apocalypses don't work, and what parts of the regex definiton's not done yet? Things have stalled a bit, and I'd like to get it going again, and the perl 6