Re: Two broken benchmarks

2004-11-21 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All: > oo1-prop.pasm and oo2-prop.pasm are both broken. Yep. First WRT calling conventions and - that's a bigger problem - again WRT DOD/GC. The latter is permanently reocurring and needs fixing. 1) The main source of troubles in hash code are the movin

Two broken benchmarks

2004-11-20 Thread Joshua Gatcomb
All: oo1-prop.pasm and oo2-prop.pasm are both broken. The only way I knew this was that there times in the benchmark graphs had dropped off the map. It was previously proposed to make the benchmarks part of the test suite being sure not to include anything that took a substantial amount of time (