Re: Yet another keyed ops proposal.

2003-12-17 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 11:56 AM +0100 12/12/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: But having multi-keyed variants of all relevant opcodes would burst our opcode count to #of-keyed-opcodes * #of-key-permutations. That's not feasable. Definitely not. Here's an alternative. I meant

Re: Yet another keyed ops proposal.

2003-12-16 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:56 AM +0100 12/12/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Yet another keyed ops proposal[1] Given the Perl6 expression: @a[$i] = @b[1] + $k; This should translate to add P0[I0], P1[1], I2 But having multi-keyed variants of all relevant opcodes would burst our opcode count to #of-keyed-opcodes

Yet another keyed ops proposal.

2003-12-12 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Yet another keyed ops proposal[1] Given the Perl6 expression: @a[$i] = @b[1] + $k; This should translate to add P0[I0], P1[1], I2 But having multi-keyed variants of all relevant opcodes would burst our opcode count to #of-keyed-opcodes * #of-key-permutations. That's not feasable. So here