On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:01 -0700, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>> The most recent version of the patch got sent to the wrong mail alias;
>> I've reattached it below.
>
> ... And now regenerated, because I've broken out a
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 15:01 -0700, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> The most recent version of the patch got sent to the wrong mail alias;
> I've reattached it below.
... And now regenerated, because I've broken out and committed one of
the fixes included in the previous version, at the request of pmic
The most recent version of the patch got sent to the wrong mail alias;
I've reattached it below.
-'f
diff --git a/MANIFEST b/MANIFEST
index b0e3c9d..43c4f52 100644
--- a/MANIFEST
+++ b/MANIFEST
@@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ config/auto/warnings/test_c.in []
config/gen/call_li
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 21:41 -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 18:25 -0700, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
> >> Please give this version a try.
> >
> > tetragon++ has reported success on Mac OS X.
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This causes the example Makefile to be autogen'd.
Thanks, applied.
leo
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #29309]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29309 >
This causes the example Makefile to be autogen'd.
? config/gen/makefiles/tcl_example
Steve Fink wrote:
... it
just replaces make's timestamp-based dependency check with a
checksum-based check.
Ah, then it's ok.
leo
On Nov-15, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink wrote:
>
> >I replied to ticket #16941 a while back but I don't think I had RT
> >actually send any mail to anybody. Anyone have an opinion on the patch
> >I put in it? (I'm trying to clean out some local changes so I can
> >apply other people's patch
Steve Fink wrote:
I replied to ticket #16941 a while back but I don't think I had RT
actually send any mail to anybody. Anyone have an opinion on the patch
I put in it? (I'm trying to clean out some local changes so I can
apply other people's patches more easily.)
Thanks.
I don't like it very
I replied to ticket #16941 a while back but I don't think I had RT
actually send any mail to anybody. Anyone have an opinion on the patch
I put in it? (I'm trying to clean out some local changes so I can
apply other people's patches more easily.)
Thanks.
http://bugs6.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.h
http://autogen.sourceforge.net/
Maybe everyone knows about this already but I didn't know about it until
just now. Enjoy.
--
May the best description of competition prevail.
(via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)
11 matches
Mail list logo
