Russ Allbery:
# Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
#
# > Yep, and the latest "pedantic" patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing
# > this, which is weird:
#
# > ld -ldbm -ldb -lm -liconv -o test_prog global_setup.o
# interpreter.o parrot.o register.o basic_opcodes.o memory.o
# bytecode.o s
Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep, and the latest "pedantic" patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing
> this, which is weird:
> ld -ldbm -ldb -lm -liconv -o test_prog global_setup.o interpreter.o parrot.o
>register.o basic_opcodes.o memory.o bytecode.o string.o strnative.o test_main.
> Easy Makefile.in patch. I was worried that Win32 might need the linker
> (the change to $(LD) was submitted as part of a Win32 compatibility
> patch) but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't have a MinGW
Fine here
Regards
Mattia
Easy Makefile.in patch. I was worried that Win32 might need the linker
(the change to $(LD) was submitted as part of a Win32 compatibility
patch) but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't have a MinGW
toolkit installed, however--can someone check that it works there? It
also works on a BSD
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:10:36AM -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote:
> You probably don't want to use ld as your linker. You should try cc
> instead.
Then that's a bug in Configure! :)
--
"If that makes any sense to you, you have a big problem."
-- C. Durance, Computer Scien
You probably don't want to use ld as your linker. You should try cc
instead.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Cozens
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/18/2001 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: bytecode and sizeof(IV)
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Segfault
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Segfault in alpha even when IVs and pointers are both 8 bytes since
> the code tries to dereference the pointers (to read IVs) at four byte
> offsets.
Yep, and the latest "pedantic" patch doesn't help. Also, I'm seeing
this, whi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:48:25AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> When trying to configure parrot with an IV = 'long long' (64-bit)
> but with int, long, and pointers only 32-bit, I get either
>
> This isn't Parrot bytecode!
>
> (on SPARC) or a segfault (on i686).
Segfault in alpha even wh
When trying to configure parrot with an IV = 'long long' (64-bit)
but with int, long, and pointers only 32-bit, I get either
This isn't Parrot bytecode!
(on SPARC) or a segfault (on i686).
I'd offer a patch, but I'm not sure which end of the process we want to
change.
--
Andy Dougher
