Re: gcc backend

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:09:11AM -0400, Jeff wrote: > Nick Glencross wrote: > > > > Has anyone given any thought to a gcc backend for generating parrot > > assembler? > > > > Even with a partial implementation in place, it would be presumably be > > p

Re: gcc backend

Nick Glencross wrote: > > Has anyone given any thought to a gcc backend for generating parrot > assembler? > > Even with a partial implementation in place, it would be presumably be > possible to use much of core C, with the benefits of register > allocation, optimiser e

gcc backend

Has anyone given any thought to a gcc backend for generating parrot assembler? Even with a partial implementation in place, it would be presumably be possible to use much of core C, with the benefits of register allocation, optimiser etc. Obviously it wouldn't be able to use much of par