RE: new event loop

2001-07-05 Thread Espen Harlinn
> "UG" == Uri Guttman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: UG> it looks pretty powerful which is one reason it may not be good to use UG> in perl. we don't expect to be doing CORBA level stuff in the core. :) That wasn't what I had in mind either, but since Perl6 is, as far as I unde

Re: new event loop

2001-07-05 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 05:29 AM 7/5/2001 -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: >Thus spake the enlightened Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > i am going to make a proposal that we ('we' to be defined > > later) develop > > a new common event loop with two major goals in mind: > > > > 1. the event loop should be fully

Re: new event loop

2001-07-05 Thread Benjamin Stuhl
Thus spake the enlightened Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > i am going to make a proposal that we ('we' to be defined > later) develop > a new common event loop with two major goals in mind: > > 1. the event loop should be fully portable over all > modern unix OS's > and the win32 ser

RE: new event loop

2001-07-04 Thread Espen Harlinn
001 08:09 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: new event loop > > > > i am going to make a proposal that we ('we' to be defined > later) develop > a new common event loop with two major goals in mind: > > 1. the event loop should be fully p