At 12:04 PM -0700 9/25/02, Jonathan Sillito wrote:
It would be nice if parrot provided the lexical scope semantics scheme (and
other languages) needs rather than have each language implement their own. I
guess this would be Dan's call, but just as another suggestion, could the
lexical ops be
Jonathan Sillito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be nice if parrot provided the lexical scope semantics scheme (and
other languages) needs rather than have each language implement their own. I
guess this would be Dan's call, but just as another suggestion, could the
lexical ops be limited
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Working on this. If everyone wants to hash out the sort of semantics
they're thinking about, we can probably get to closure reasonably fast
and get things designed and implemented quickly.
My scheme implementation is a working (a little bit hacky but
On 26 Sep 2002, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
These may be nice but not needed for scheme
* get keyed with INTVAL (getting direct to the Hashes)
* set keyed with INTVAL;STRING
Both get(INTVAL;STRING) and set(INTVAL;STRING) are needed (or at least
useful) for accessing hidden lexicals in outer
[cc'd to perl6-internals]
Jonathan Sillito [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
If I remember correctly Sean's patch did store the scratchpad with the
Sub.pmc, except that I retreived it from the current context's pad_stack.
Then when Sub.pmc was invoked it pushed the correct pad on the stack. I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The current pad_stack handling is very much tied to Sub.pmc. The only
way of getting the current scope is creation of a new sub; the only
way setting the current pad is invoking this sub.
But I didn't used
Ups, something went wrong with my last mail, the explaining text was
chopped off. Ok here its again.
Hi,
I just got functions running in scheme.
It uses a pre-version of Sean O'Rourkes scratchpad.pmc. (Sean, I had to
reimplement some functions to get it compile, did I get them right?)
P31
On 24 Sep 2002, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
I just got functions running in scheme.
It uses a pre-version of Sean O'Rourkes scratchpad.pmc. (Sean, I had to
reimplement some functions to get it compile, did I get them right?)
Hopefully it will be easy to reconcile our different versions (and will
