Mitchell N Charity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
README says
[ snip ]
There was more outdatet stuff in there. Fixed.
Mitchell
leo
Mitchell N Charity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some quick observations on parrot_2004-02-26_08.
Files with ^M:
[ ... ]
./t/op/00ff-dos.t
Actually that one is failing on Win32!!!1 Is this caused by the test
system? Which line endings do we support?
The file ./testyamd probably belongs
--- Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitchell N Charity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some quick observations on parrot_2004-02-26_08.
Files with ^M:
[ ... ]
./t/op/00ff-dos.t
Actually that one is failing on Win32!!!1 Is this caused by the test
system? Which line endings
Some quick observations on parrot_2004-02-26_08.
Odd files to be executable:
./docs/dev/dod.dev
./docs/dev/rx.dev
./languages/tcl/MAINTAINER
./languages/tcl/examples/Makefile
./lib/Digest/Perl/MD5.pm
A perl by any other name, may be a different perl.
perl and /usr/bin/perl
On 26 Feb 2004, at 18:57, Mitchell N Charity wrote:
A perl by any other name, may be a different perl.
perl and /usr/bin/perl are both common in #!'s.
I been changing them to #! perl -w when i find them, which is why
your list covers the places I haven't visited. The good thing about the
bang
