[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmm, so this is (kind of) akin to the regcomp fix - it is the "new" stuff
> that is in yyl?val that should be free-d. And it is worse than that
> as yyl?val is just the topmost the parser state, so if I understand correctly
> it isn't only their current values, but also
Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>If an eval{} fails because of a snytax error, yydestroy is called on
>leaving the eval scope. Unfortunately it does this:
>
>yyval = ysave->oldyyval;
>yylval = ysave->oldyylval;
>
>So anything that is in those 2 vars that hasn't made i
