Benjamin Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest the opnames/categories "mutate," "alias," and "create."
IMHO, we could leave PASM syntax as it is and create opcode aliases
inside the assembler ...
> I believe that the most in^H^H logical shorthand spellings of these
> opcodes woul
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
> implementation.
Sadly, this was not considered when hq9+ was developed, so it's not
actually part of the language. Maybe someone should develop and
extended versi
Michal Wallace wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, K Stol wrote:
What do you think? Want to try squishing pirate/python
and pirate/lua together? :)
Yeah, I like the idea. Let's try this out.
Well, I finished reading your report[1] and
posted some of my (rather unorganized) thoughts
up at
Lars Balker Rasmussen (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # New Ticket Created by Lars Balker Rasmussen
> # Please include the string: [perl #23025]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23025 >
>
>
> There's
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> > > This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
> > > implementation.
> >
>
At 10:01 PM +0300 8/8/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
> At 9:21 PM +0300 8/8/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
> > So, the project. Someone needs to go through the configure procedure
>> and the headers and throw a PARROT_ prefix in front of all the HAS_
>> defines we define, so we can avoid this prob
