Pre-RFC: Require a warning on spaces after here-document "terminator"

2000-08-20 Thread Ariel Scolnicov
I was asked to debug a weird Perl5 problem yesterday. The code in question looked roughly like this (indented 4 spaces, but otherwise unchanged): #!perl -w use strict; print

RFC 130 (v3) Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6

2000-08-20 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6 =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Szabó, Balázs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17 Aug 2000 Last Modified: 19 Aug 2000 Version: 3 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Numbe

RFC 135 (v1) Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters.

2000-08-20 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters. =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: August 20, 2000 Version: 1 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFC 134 (v1) Alternative array and hash slicing

2000-08-20 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Alternative array and hash slicing =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Mike Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 20 Aug 2000 Version: 1 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Number: 134 =head1 ABSTRACT This RFC a

RFC 133 (v1) Alternate Syntax for variable names

2000-08-20 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Alternate Syntax for variable names =head1 VERSION Maintainer: David Corbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 20 Aug 2000 Version: 1 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Number: 133 =head1 ABSTRACT Many new

RFC 130 (v2) Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6

2000-08-20 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
This and other RFCs are available on the web at http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ =head1 TITLE Transaction-enabled variables for Perl6 =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Szabó, Balázs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17 Aug 2000 Last Modified: 18 Aug 2000 Version: 2 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Numbe

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-20 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Ed" == Ed Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ed> Is eq needed? Can't == be used for either context? Ed>$a == 'cat' Ed> is readily distinguishable from Ed>$a == 2; Ed> so the compiler should be able to determine context. Yes, but what about: $a = '3.14'; # from reading a

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-20 Thread Spider Boardman
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000 17:50:20 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote (in part): Nat> Ed Mills writes: >> Is eq needed? Can't == be used for either context? $a == >> 'cat' is readily distinguishable from $a == 2; so the compiler >> should be able to determine context. Nat> if ($a == $b) Nat> Is th

Re: Do we really need eq?

2000-08-20 Thread Nathan Torkington
Ed Mills writes: > Is eq needed? Can't == be used for either context? >$a == 'cat' > is readily distinguishable from >$a == 2; > so the compiler should be able to determine context. if ($a == $b) Is that string comparison or numeric comparison? Nat

Do we really need eq?

2000-08-20 Thread Ed Mills
Is eq needed? Can't == be used for either context? $a == 'cat' is readily distinguishable from $a == 2; so the compiler should be able to determine context. Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://