On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Tim Bunce wrote: [...] > That beautiful code will be beautifully _open_ to _external_ extensions. > And that is how I imagine that Perl 5 support should be implemented. Exactly. I am pretty sure that already at the meeting in Monterey someone suggested that Perl5 should be the first test of the language extension mechanism. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Peter Scott
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... David Whipp
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Tim Bunce
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... John Porter
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Simon Cozens
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's A... Edward Peschko
- Re: Parsing perl 5 with perl 6 (was Re: Larry's Apocal... Dan Sugalski