Python? Didn't know you were so into tuples...
I thought your head would be turned by Ruby ;-)
BTW - There's a Ruby "Inline::Perl" module in alpha
testing now...this will be a nice complement to the
"Inline::Python" module already available...
Must dash - Vijay
--
__
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:06:41PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> having wantarray return the number of items needed, or -1 for
> all of them, would work very nicely for user-written partial returners.
>
> Did anyone RFC that?
There was quite a bit of discussion about how to handle this on list
> "Where's the likes of David Grove when you need one?"
I don't even know what you're talking about.
Leave me alone. I'm learning Python...
again.
p
Just a thought. No need for replies.
Suggestion: rename local your.
my is mine, nothing to do with anyone else's code.
our is ours, used in my code and declared in a package
known to my code.
your is yours, the value used in code I call. Oh, and
it's also ours.
On Saturday 02 June 2001 11:21 am, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> On Friday 01 June 2001 11:06 pm, David L. Nicol wrote:
> > having wantarray return the number of items needed, or -1 for
> > all of them, would work very nicely for user-written partial returners.
> >
> > Did anyone RFC that?
>
> RFC 21'
On Friday 01 June 2001 11:06 pm, David L. Nicol wrote:
> having wantarray return the number of items needed, or -1 for
> all of them, would work very nicely for user-written partial returners.
>
> Did anyone RFC that?
RFC 21's expectation counts, I believe.
(Except it's ~0 vice -1 for all items.)