Re: RFC - Hashing PMC's albie@halfarrabio.di.uminho.pt

2002-07-25 Thread Luke Palmer
On 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I don't like the C is Hashed::ByValues because it smacks of spooky action at a distance; I much prefer my notion of C %h{*@x} = 1. And in Perl 6 I have the horrible feeling that C %h = (*@x = 1) would expand to C %h = (1,2,3 = 1) ,

Re: RFC - Hashing PMC's albie@halfarrabio.di.uminho.pt

2002-07-25 Thread Luke Palmer
On 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 25 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally I don't like the C is Hashed::ByValues because it smacks of spooky action at a distance; I much prefer my notion of C %h{*@x} = 1. And in Perl 6 I

Re: RFC - Hashing PMC's albie@halfarrabio.di.uminho.pt

2002-07-25 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 03:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: my @x is Hashed::ByValues = (1,2,3); %h = (@x = 1); @x[1] += 4; Personally I don't like the C is Hashed::ByValues because it smacks of spooky action at a distance; I much prefer