On Jul 24, chromatic wrote:
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 05:28 PM, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
If this were Java, the way to do this would be to define a Thingie
interface, and then an (archetypical) ThingieObject class... any time
that we want to actually *create* Thingies, we would use new
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 09:45 , Kurt Starsinic wrote:
On Jul 24, chromatic wrote:
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 05:28 PM, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
The problem with Java interfaces is that you have to rely on the
library writer to have expected you to use an interface. Given the
