> I have quite a few fonts, the only one I can find where | is a broken
> bar is "Terminal", a font for DOS programs that uses the cp437
> charset, which is incompatable with latin1 (? and ? are AE and AF
> instead of AB and BB) and it dosen't even havI have quite a few fonts,
> the only one I can
Goplat wrote:
I have quite a few fonts, the only one I can find where | is a broken bar is
"Terminal", a font for DOS programs that uses the cp437 charset, which is
incompatable with latin1 (« and » are AE and AF instead of AB and BB) and it
dosen't even have a ¦. So, it dosen't seem like a proble
--- Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kara Perlistoj,
>
> the zip operator is a useful one. I like it a lot. But I've been writing
> zip() all the time, even though I think an infix operator is nicer. (Not
> for for though, because you also have commas in the pointy sub's
> parameter list.)
>
>
Kara Perlistoj,
the zip operator is a useful one. I like it a lot. But I've been writing
zip() all the time, even though I think an infix operator is nicer. (Not
for for though, because you also have commas in the pointy sub's
parameter list.)
However, the broken bar is in my opinion a bad choice
