On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:00:53PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
%num_of_linesfile = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
: because the Perl 5 way would put a reference to @file in the hash.
: Scalar context always makes references now, from what I understand.
Interestingly, a stored reference would track
Hi,
quoting an old post from Luke (http://xrl.us/ftet):
Ctieing is going to work quite differently, from what I hear.
So it might be possible to overload any function to call a
special version when your type of array is used. You just have
to write all the special versions.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:14:04AM +0300, wolverian wrote:
: On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:00:53PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: %num_of_linesfile = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
:
: : because the Perl 5 way would put a reference to @file in the hash.
: : Scalar context always makes references now, from
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 06:01:48PM -0700, Dave Whipp wrote:
: The following is legal perl:
:
: print $a $b $c if ($a,$b,$c)=(1,2,3);
:
: This prints 1 2 3, but the definitions obviously aren't scoped to the
: modified statement. And a Cmy in the modifier is a bit too late.
:
: Any reason to
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:02:41PM +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: Hi,
:
: quoting an old post from Luke (http://xrl.us/ftet):
: Ctieing is going to work quite differently, from what I hear.
: So it might be possible to overload any function to call a
: special version when your
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-04-12 through 2005-04-19
All~
Sadly, a slip of the mouse cause me to delete a partially completed
summary, so I am going to push ahead on the rewrite without a witty
intro. Feel free to make one up for yourself involving stuffed animals,
musicians, and
