Re: Why submethods

2005-10-30 Thread Sam Vilain
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 17:30 -0400, Stevan Little wrote: > However, it could also be that the creator of Foo did not intend for > subclasses to be able to "Just Work", and that the whole idea of Foo > is to do a "Template Method" style pattern in which subclasses must > implement the &help_pro

Re: Why submethods

2005-10-30 Thread Uri Guttman
> "DC" == Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DC> But factoring method implementations out into a subroutines is DC> also extremely annoying, because a subroutine doesn't provide the DC> internal conveniences that a method does. In particular, it DC> doesn't have an invocant and