Author: larry
Date: Fri Jun 30 16:40:05 2006
New Revision: 9730
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
Typo spotted by TreyHarris++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
> > +This hides any qX rule that might be defined in the gramma. Note
> s/gramma/grammar/ if you please.
Erm, credit TreyHarris on this one, as he seems to have spotted it
first on #perl6.
--
"Of all things, good sense is the most fairly distributed: everyone
thinks he is so well supplie
> +This hides any qX rule that might be defined in the gramma. Note
s/gramma/grammar/ if you please. I prefer the new quoting behaviour and
I like << and >> as word boundaries. (Sometimes I miss Vim regexes' \<
and \>.) Are << and >> zero-width?
--
"The rules of programming are transitory;
Author: pmichaud
Date: Fri Jun 30 15:53:39 2006
New Revision: 9729
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
describe below -> described below
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.
Author: larry
Date: Fri Jun 30 15:31:34 2006
New Revision: 9728
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
<( and )> no longer need to balance.
<< and >> are now directional word boundaries, along with « and ».
is generic replacement for \b, for \B
Clarified
Author: larry
Date: Fri Jun 30 15:17:55 2006
New Revision: 9727
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Revised quote declarator.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Author: larry
Date: Fri Jun 30 12:07:05 2006
New Revision: 9726
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
Forgot to update versions and dates...
Modified: doc/tru
Author: larry
Date: Fri Jun 30 11:57:00 2006
New Revision: 9725
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
Change "env" variables to "context" variables.
Modified:
What is supposed to happen if one says:
class Dog {
has $:tail handles 'wag';
meth wag { # something else than $:tail.wag
}
}
Is it a compilation error? Or one of the definitions prevail (with a
warning or something)?
Adriano Ferreira.