On 8/17/06, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say 01234 on the theory that the 3-arg loop is really saying:
$n = 0;
while $n 5 {
NEXT { ++$n }
NEXT { print $n }
}
and also on the theory that block exiting blocks always run in reverse order.
Dear Larry, I
Author: audreyt
Date: Thu Sep 7 07:07:43 2006
New Revision: 11817
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
16:06 agentzh audreyt: could you fix the modifer typo in S04 for me? :)
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
markstos++ pointed out the following behavior:
use v6-alpha;
{
when 1 ~~ 0 {
say Surprise!
}
}
This code prints Surprise!, because $_ is undef, which is false, just
like 1 ~~ 0 is.
I'd like to make the following suggestions for Synopsis clarification:
1. It will be a
Trey Harris wrote:
markstos++ pointed out the following behavior:
use v6-alpha;
{
when 1 ~~ 0 {
say Surprise!
}
}
This code prints Surprise!, because $_ is undef, which is false, just
like 1 ~~ 0 is.
I'd like to make the following suggestions for Synopsis
On 9/7/06, Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To refine this point a bit, the spec is clear that 'when' is useful not
just with 'given' but with any block that sets $_.
I agree that it should be an error outside of any block that sets $_,
I disagree. I don't see aproblem with having it
I'll hold up some error handling in CGI::Application as use case some
for some CATCH spec refinements. The Perl 5 code is below for reference.
First, we handle the exception conditionally based /not/ on the
exception itself, but whether we have an exception handle installed
to deal with it. Is it
