Re: Standards bearers (was "Re: xml and perl 6")

2007-12-11 Thread ispyhumanfly
Paul Hodges wrote: But on this general note, is there any current organization or location where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my time is as limited as everyone's If I could get small bites of work to do, maybe I could contribute something useful. Anyone reque

Re: Standards bearers (was "Re: xml and perl 6")

2007-12-11 Thread Paul Hodges
It also helps that you consistently make incisive observations and contributions to conversations, even if they are a little tart sometimes. :) But on this general note, is there any current organization or location where small problems are being parcelled out? I'd love to help, but my time is as

Re: Standards bearers (was "Re: xml and perl 6")

2007-12-11 Thread Paul Hodges
duh. I'll learn to finish reading all the posts before adding my own *someday*. --- Darren Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > >Darren Duncan wrote: > >>At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > >>>Equally, Something to replace

Re: Standards bearers (was "Re: xml and perl 6")

2007-12-11 Thread Darren Duncan
At 10:23 AM +0300 12/11/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote: Darren Duncan wrote: At 9:04 AM +0300 12/10/07, Richard Hainsworth wrote: Equally, Something to replace CGI or DBI will be essential to the uptake of P6. I would far prefer to have a skilled and resourceful professional, such as yourself or