Author: masak
Date: 2009-03-14 13:34:42 +0100 (Sat, 14 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25821
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
specced syntactic 'where' sugar in param lists
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
===
---
Author: masak
Date: 2009-03-14 13:34:50 +0100 (Sat, 14 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25822
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
replaced underscores with dashes in variable names in IO.pod
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Author: masak
Date: 2009-03-14 13:34:54 +0100 (Sat, 14 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25823
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
replaced 'record' with 'line' in IO.pod
'record' is fine and understandable in the Unix world, and used by
tools such as awk -- but line is
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 06:29:19PM -0700, Jon Lang wrote:
: +To declare an item that is parsed as a simple term, you must use the
: +form C term:foo , or some other form of constant declaration such
: +as an enum declaration. Such a term never looks for its arguments,
: +is never considered a
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-03-14 18:32:42 +0100 (Sat, 14 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25830
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
Log:
[IO] Massive overhaul, long overdue due to neglect of TimToady--
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Larry Wall la...@wall.org wrote:
: So if I were to say:
:
: rand $n:
:
: is the compiler smart enough to notice that trailing colon and
: recognize this as an indirect method call rather than two adjacent
: terms?
No, currently under STD you get:
