Moritz (>):
> I think we should consider the implications of immutability-all-the-way-down
> before we jump to any conclusions. In particular list cases where typical
> Perl 5 code fails when ported to Perl 6.
Indeed. Clearly I'm missing at least one piece of the puzzle here.
Back to the drawing-
Am 09.09.2011 12:44, schrieb Carl Mäsak:
Non-rw attributes, non-rw parameters, and non-rw return values all
share the same mechanism. Fine. Makes sense.
[...]
Non-rw-ness in this case should be "all the way", not one level down.
(I hope I didn't change the meaning by stripping parts of your q
Thanks to everyone for your replies. I've been wanting to write a
summary + further thoughts for a while, but have been a bit
time-constrained.
The central tension in this issue is nicely captured by what Damian
wrote contrasted with what Stefan wrote:
Damian (>):
> Doing nothing should result in