Re: [perl6/specs] 614b6f: doc with/without

2015-08-11 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Is there an error in the cascade? Shouldn't the indices be 'a', 'b', 'c'; not 'a','a','a' ? On 08/10/2015 11:26 PM, yary wrote: with, without look awesome. -y On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:38 PM, GitHub nore...@github.com mailto:nore...@github.com wrote: Branch: refs/heads/master

[perl6/specs] 4b6a1f: Kebab-case IO::Notification.watch_path

2015-08-11 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: 4b6a1fc316c999c07f95754dc1a7ebd166a917f9 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/4b6a1fc316c999c07f95754dc1a7ebd166a917f9 Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen l...@dijkmat.nl Date: 2015-08-11 (Tue, 11 Aug 2015)

[perl6/specs] b02fdf: fix minor typos

2015-08-11 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: b02fdfafca4555c3b86bdabc27f4518829e825b8 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/b02fdfafca4555c3b86bdabc27f4518829e825b8 Author: Steve Mynott steve.myn...@gmail.com Date: 2015-08-11 (Tue, 11 Aug 2015)

[perl6/specs] e155c0: Speculate about Supply.throttle($elems,$seconds)

2015-08-11 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: e155c08e014b72d4013daab29dec69b18df48368 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/e155c08e014b72d4013daab29dec69b18df48368 Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen l...@dijkmat.nl Date: 2015-08-11 (Tue, 11 Aug 2015)

[perl6/specs] 982eda: Prevent some confusion re a b c

2015-08-11 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: 982edab7a3714452afc126d478c83e5dc71377e5 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/982edab7a3714452afc126d478c83e5dc71377e5 Author: Elizabeth Mattijsen l...@dijkmat.nl Date: 2015-08-12 (Wed, 12 Aug 2015)

Re: [perl6/specs] 614b6f: doc with/without

2015-08-11 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
If this is about: These may be cascaded: with $s.index(a) { Found a at $_ } orwith $s.index(b) { Found b at $_ } orwith $s.index(c) { Found c at $_ } else { Didn't find a, b or cā€ } then the code is correct. What would be the point of searching for ā€œaā€ again