I'd like to know where EXACTLY whitespace is permitted in rules. Is it
legal to write
\c [CHARACTER NAME]
or must I write
\c[CHARACTER NAME]
--
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan % How can we ever be the sold short or
RPI Acacia Brother #734 % the cheated, we who for eve
I want to be sure. I'm also curious about whitespace. Is "<[" one
token, or can I write "< [a-z] >" and have it be a character class?
Thanks for your help. Unless you're difficult.
--
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan % How can we ever be the sold sh
On May 24, Jonathan Scott Duff said:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:25:03PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
http://japhy.perlmonk.org/perl6/rules.txt
That looks completish to me. (At least I didn't think, "hey! where's
such and such?")
Oh, frabjous day!
On
On May 25, Jonathan Scott Duff said:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:24:50PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
I wish was allowed. I don't see why has to be confined
to zero-width assertions.
I don't either actually. One thing that occurred to me while responding
to you
On May 25, Mark A. Biggar said:
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:24:50PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
I wish was allowed. I don't see why has to be confined to
zero-width assertions.
I don't either actually. One thing that occurred to me
On May 26, Patrick R. Michaud said:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 08:25:03PM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
I have looked through the latest
revisions of Apo05 and Syn05 (from Dec 2004) and come up with the
following list:
http://japhy.perlmonk.org/perl6/rules.txt
I'll review
ple who are really going to use it, the notation won't be
foreign. And I'd expect most people who'd use it would actually abstract
a good portion of it away into their own property definitions, so that
<~(X & Y) | Z>
would actually just be
<+My_XYZ_Property>
w
ith and .
It should be assumed that doesn't capture because it can only
capture if P matches, in which case fails.
So, what's the deal?
--
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan % How can we ever be the sold short or
RPI Acacia Brother #734 % the cheated, we who
and 'after' rules, but how do they access that argument?
How do I write a rule that takes an argument?
--
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan % How can we ever be the sold short or
RPI Acacia Brother #734 % the cheated, we who for every service
http://japhy.perlmonk.org/ % have long ago been overpaid?
http://www.perlmonks.org/ %-- Meister Eckhart
