- Original Message -
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, December 18, 2004 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: Auto My?
Rod Adams writes:
There are pros and cons, and it basically ends up being a design
choice.
Well, at least when strictures are on. When they are off, the
coder
I define outside the core as anything that isn't
packaged with Perl itself. Things you'd define as
part of the language. I/O stuff, threading stuff,
standard types, builtin functions, etc. And yeah,
most of that stuff will be written natively in C,
PIR, or be part of parrot itself.
I think
- Original Message -
From: David Storrs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:04 pm
Subject: Re: Why do users need FileHandles?
Second, I would suggest that it NOT go in a library...this is
reasonably serious under-the-hood magic and should be integrated into
the core for
- Original Message -
From: James Mastros [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sunday, July 18, 2004 5:03 am
Subject: xx and re-running
Recently on perlmonks, at
http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=375255,
someone (DWS, actually) brought up the common error of expecting x
(in
particular,
- Original Message -
From: Dan Hursh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: Why do users need FileHandles?
Luke Palmer wrote:
JOSEPH RYAN writes:
- Original Message -
From: David Storrs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:04
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:50:16PM -0400, JOSEPH RYAN wrote:
To answer the latter first, rand (with no arguments) returns a number
greater than or equal to 0 and less than 1 which when used as an index
into an array gets turned into a 0.
As to why the second pop would take forever, I'd
- Original Message -
From: Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 7, 2004 11:25 pm
Subject: Re: push with lazy lists
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:32:07PM -0500, Dan
Hursh wrote:
: how 'bout
:
: @x = gather{
: loop{
: take time
: }
: } # can this be
- Original Message -
From: Dan Hursh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, July 2, 2004 10:32 pm
Subject: Re: push with lazy lists
Joseph Ryan wrote:
I guess that's true with X..Y lazy lists. I
thought there were
other
ways to make lazy lists, like giving it a closure
that gets called
- Original Message -
From: David Storrs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2004 7:55 pm
Subject: Re: if not C, then what?
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:14:37PM -0700, Jonathan Lang wrote:
Juerd wrote:
If you're really enamoured with the infix operator syntax,
consider this
- Original Message -
From: Dan Hursh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, July 2, 2004 2:23 pm
Subject: push with lazy lists
Hi,
If I can assume:
@x = 3..5;
say pop @x;# prints 5
@x = 3..5;
push @x, 6;
say pop @x;# prints 6
say
- Original Message -
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 pm
Subject: Re: undo()?
Oh no! Someone doesn't understand continuations! How could this
happen?! :-)
You need two things to bring the state of the process back to an
earlierstate: undo
- Original Message -
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:13 am
Subject: Re: A stack for Perl?
1;
$_='foo bar baz';
split;
# @STACK now is (1, 'foo', 'bar', 'baz');
To boot, I can't think of a way to implement that in currently-defined
Woops, sent it to the wrong list!
- Joe
Joseph Ryan wrote:
Luke Palmer wrote:
Austin Hastings writes:
Hmm. The text and examples so far have been about methods and this
seems to be about multi-methods. Correct me if I'm wrong ...
You're wrong. Consider my example, where via single
Dmitry Dorofeev wrote:
Hi all.
Sorry if this idea|question has been discussed or has name which i
don't know about.
snip
I'd like to write
Class myclass : a {
forget method area;
forget method move;
method put;
}
so methods getX, getY, size will be 'inherited'.
Methods 'area' and 'move' will
David Wheeler wrote:
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 06:11 PM, Joseph Ryan wrote:
Not to be a jerk, but how about:
my $is_ok = 1;
for @array_of_random_values_and_types - $t {
if not some_sort_of_test($t) {
$is_ok = 0;
last;
}
}
if $is_ok
Luke Palmer wrote:
So, we can have :: in names, but that doesn't represent any inherent
relationship between the module before the :: and the one after. I
think this is an important thing to keep.
However, will it be possible to, for example, do:
module Foo;
module Bar { ... }
And refer
Damian Conway wrote:
Larry wrote:
This kind of behaviour is more useful for nested classes, I suspect, but
it should certainly be available for nested modules as well.
So, what's the difference between a module and a class, and
why would you want dynamic namespaces? Isn't that something
you'd
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:00:54PM +0100, Alberto Manuel Brand?o Sim?es wrote:
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 14:49, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alberto Manuel Brandão simões) writes:
The question is simple, and Dan can have the same problem (or him or
18 matches
Mail list logo
